Medal of Honor Review
Short Version: Medal of Honor is just average in everyway possible. Perhaps to eager to join the current trends by going “modern”, MOH is unfortunately not quite the production level of Modern warfare 2 and not as refined as Bad Company 2 – making it seem like a game without a strong purpose. Honestly, I would have rather the MOH franchise stayed in WWII.
What you’ll Like:
• You battle in Afghanistan, something that most games have tried to stay away from
• Military Jargon and Atmoshpere is dead on, perhaps too much so that its not cinematic enough
• Excellent sound design!
• Best Part: The Helicopter, AC-130 attacks and ATV riding
What you’ll Hate:
• Relatively Boring but Passable Campaign
• Whats with some of these cutscenes, did Danger Close not finish them?
• Too few game modes and extras in multiplayer to have any staying power
• Game’s Campaign took me ….only “5 HOURS and 37 Minutes!!!” to complete!
• Map balancing needs work
• Worst Part: Why does this game exist?
Final Verdict:
5/10
Average
- Related Posts:
-
Good Dev, Bad Dev #1
May 22, 2013
-
Xbox One Reveal: Angry Rant
May 21, 2013
-
Metro: Last Light Angry Review
May 17, 2013
-
Guns Of Icarus TGS Battle Royale!
May 11, 2013
Gaming Comics
Good Dev, Bad Dev #1
Glue
Unjust Battles
The Confessionist
Fight the Biscuit!
Recent Reviews
- Metro: Last Light Angry Review
May 17, 2013 
Star Command iOS Angry Review
May 6, 2013
Star Trek The Game Angry Review
April 30, 2013
Injustice Angry Review
April 19, 2013
Defiance Angry Review
April 12, 2013
Partners
198 thoughts on “Medal of Honor Review”
Did anyone else have friendly fire issues? Played this game when my older brother had it on gamefly, and every time i’d be flanking enemies in cover, moving to another cover, or MOH-ing an MG nest, I’d take damage from my team mates, more often then not, THEY killed me, not the enemy. Anyone else suffer from that or was it just me?
The only thing I liked, is that they showed my country’s armed forces and insurgents. The Armed Forces of the Philippines alongside CTs stopping the Abu Sayyaf Group
i actually thougth it was good game the single player is short but good and the multiplayer its not easy you have to learn to play tactically, to watch were your going, know when to move cause if not you’ll just die very easily cause you kinda die fast you learn also how to use cover efectively and when i played as a sniper i could actually how i was opening paths for my team to move forward, honestly this game in a way forced you to cooaporate as a team or play very tactical
Angry Joe’s worst review yet!
to me its the same game just with a different title and they should stay as a WW2 types games n yes ive play both Call of Duty n Metal of Honnor >:(
This game is like cod with better graphics
the beard…….. IT STARES INTO MY SOUL!!!!!!!
that was surreal and hilarious……… and terrifying. i just thoguht you were doing a manly beard gimmick. then the fuckign beard starts talking, the eyes appear. its better than the annoying orange at least.
though i will say the gimmick did eat up the time for explanation, but i guess the lack of reference shows that the game was really bland.
but dude, i beg you, what inspired you to create that abomination of man, god, and facial hair?
It’s a shame, seems like this game could be really excellent, but they need to do something different. Perhaps tking it into the distant-future, with Crysis or Mass Effect style abilities and customization? This serie shas huge potential, but sadly, like Homefront, it just can’t make itself exceptional, something it must do in the same genre as the Modern Warfare and Battlefield series.
i have this game and it is forgetable
Medal of Honor should stay in it’s WWII form, and not becoming a standard generic “realistic” modern day shooter, MOH is not meant to be realistic. It’s basicly the same formula as Return to castle Wolfenstein: a secret agent who kills a massive army of Wehrmacht soldiers, simple right? Around 2007 we were getting tired of WWII games, but now it’s the other way around! Bring the WWII games back! They were so much more engaging en fun to play. Don’t go modern just because everyone else does.
right? … i looove WW2 shooters…. modern shooters suck….
all the guns are basically assault rifles…. WW2 has more variety it feels like.
and bolt action vs bolt action was so fun cause it was suspensful like, like the moment u have to bolt ur gun makes it more exciting…
i have to agree with you go back to where your good ww2 however i must say ALL thats ALL ,as far as im aware, moh’s were based on a true story
ALL OF THEM some one actually did that SH*T
every game is too short but yeah had to be longer although i liked it alot a feeling that i didnt have with other fps’s because you got to fight a more real enemy Taliban. multiplayer was a short on …everything killstreaks? really? thats where i have MW for!!!! just a feeeeeew weapons? ….hmmmm where is MW aah eject
Its a like or hate game.
yeah i liked it though want the second game i like to follow story’s…MW and stuff …. multiplayer will probably be better in MOH Firewarrior