• Welcome to the Angry Joe Show Army!

    Join our community of gamers passionate about our community and our hobby! Whether it's playing, discussing, or watching games, regardless of platform, genre, or location, we have a place for you, always!

  • PS4 Forum

    The AJSA Playstation 4 Division: Game Nights and More!

    The AJSA is on Playstation 4! Join us for weekly Game Nights with a selection of the best games the PS4 has to offer!

  • XBO Forum

    The AJSA Xbox One Division: We Got You Covered!

    The AJSA Xbox One Division is ready to connect with you on XBox Live with a ton of events for the best Xbox games!

  • News Archive

    The Best News from the Best Sites, Every Week.

    The AJSA News Collection Team is hard at work condensing a week's worth of news into one giant-sze digest for you to chew on and discuss! Links to source articles are always provided!

  • More Info

    The AJSA Expeditionary Force: Deploying to Play the Best PC Games!

    The elite vanguard of the AJSA, the Expeditionary Force (EF) chooses a new PC game every week! Join us for weekly events and help decide if the game has a future in the AJSA.

  • The Team

    Streaming Now: The AJSA Stream Team

    Joe can't stream every game, but our talented AJSA Stream Team covers a wide variety of games and personalities! Check them out, and show them some AJSA Love!

  • The Tube

    The AJSA Community YouTube Channel

    Featuring news, gameplay clips, and more from the community! The Community is a chance to showcase the best moments in AJSA Gaming!


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Doctor

  • Rank
    Heroic Member

Contact Methods

  • SN
  1. In broad sense tens of space games shares the gameplay; mining, dogfighting, trading, etc. but implementations varies hugely. More and more games has explorable astronomical objects as well. Because the huge differences in design and implementation I could say that for example Star Citizen and NMS are still completely different kind of games. I think that lore and gameplay are tightly connected. In Star Citizen the lore explains why for example Hurston looks like as it looks, people's behaviour and clothing, characteristics of their physical look (marks on skin), their motivations, what player can mine and buy/sell there, gravity and composition of atmosphere, weather, etc. I definitely have high hopes that BG&E2 will be an interesting and good game despite that we have not seen much gameplay yet and there are still many unanswered questions. It is worth to keep in mind that ambitious games takes long time to get developed. BG&E3 should be much faster to get made once all this R&D work has done. Good luck for your competition. After your earlier success we expect nothing less than championship!
  2. It is true many games shares lots of similarities but they can still be completely different what comes to gameplay and experience; Star Citizen, NMS, BG&E2, X-series, Elite: Dangerous, Hellion, Helium Rain, Euro Track Simulator, etc. Star Citizen is heavily leaning on lore. Star systems are hand created and procedurally generated astronomical objects are partially hand crafted (added POIs etc.). Their star system design is more or less scientific but for example they have shortened distances and shrinked size of objects for gameplay reasons. The current alpha version has multiple of misson types but the key is to have upcoming mission chaining, dynamic missions and background simulation. Elite: Dangerous is following science much more accurately in expense of having no lore or handmade stories on their astronomical objects, NPCs, etc. NMS seems to be fully procedurally generated; works for them. What comes to experience Star Citizen is much more like Cyberpunk 2077 than NMS. Your character wakes up in rented flat, you get up and wear some clothes from wardrobe, take a clean coffee cup from a drawer and put to coffee machine, select a coffee and wait for full cup, you drink the coffee and put the cup with other dirty cups in a drawer. After coffee you make a live video call (FoIP+VoIP) to your friend and agree to meet her in a bar nearby. You go there by walking and a train. Gameplay continues... Completely different experience compared to NMS or Elite: Dangerous and I'm not even sure if Cyberpunk 2077 has such details. BG&E2 seems to be more like Star Citizen what comes to star system design and implementation. In the other hand their engine is voxel based, it has only 3rd person view(?) and action scenes and flying model are very arcade. I don't know if it will have detailed item handling, multiple of physics grids, ship interiors, detailed damage modelling, etc. So, lots of similarities on the paper but in practice all the games are very different. That's a great thing since they are fulling each other instead of competing. I hope Squadron 42 will not be released before 2020. We have to wait just like we have to wait other games in development; BG&E2, Cyberpunk 2077, etc.
  3. True, BG&E2 will be probably released before Star Citizen PU and Squadron 42. I definitely recommend to look Star Citizen a bit more closely (design documents, design discussion, alpha releases, etc.) so you could compare it to other projects. I just wanted to give a note that ambition of Star Citizen is way beyond BG&E2 (as much we know about at this point). It is worth to keep in mind that just adding explorable procedurally generated planets to games doesn't make them like Star Citizen. Cyberpunk 2077 is interesting and I look forward give it a try. It definitely more close to Star Citizen single player campaign Squadron 42 than Star Citizen PU (MMO). Still, it is very different kind of game and I'm slightly "worried" how much it will have shooting scenes because in demo it looked pretty weak. We will know more soon enough. I'm not a huge fan of No Man's Sky myself but I can say it has got tons of better after all these multiple of patches. NEXT patch is just one of them. Still NMS is nothing like Star Citizen so it is wortless to make a comparison. Some people prefers NMS kind of game and that's great. It is definitely good to have lots of different kind of games. Unfortunately especially AAA-games tends to be more or less the same. No one wants to take big risks which is understandable.
  4. X4: Foundations was released two weeks ago and it is good to see it has got pretty positive feedback. As we have unfortunately already experiences many times Egosoft's releases are far from ready on release. That's still not a catastrophe because Egosoft is one of those companies which supports their games years after release. I'm very disappointed to is how badly game sites has covered this release - especially PC game sites. Linux version should go Beta at some point in near future.
  5. BG&E2 is ambitious but what we have seen or heard so far it is nothing compared to Star Citizen (I recommend to give that project a peek). What I have seen so far many seems to be disappointed and worried how different it is compared to BG&E. It is a valid concern but it is still too early to be TOO worried about how the game will end up to be. It is great to see they are using all the time they need with this project. Btw. No Man's Sky has a story and patches (NEXT, Atlas Rises, The Abyss, Visions, etc.) has made the game much better.
  6. In my opinion Bethesda's games has always been mediocre at best and thanks to modding community to make their games much more playable. I wish Fallout IP would move to some other developer especially now when we lost Wasteland to Microsoft.
  7. The plans for NPCs are incredible ambitious and hopefully they are able to implement as planned. As far as I know the idea would be that a player is not able to identify if a character is NPC or another player. It could be that NPCs will not be added for a while so the universe will stay pretty empty until then. Who knows, maybe they start to add NPCs once those backround simulations are started. It is actually pretty interesting that adding just a new tech like gas clouds can potentially add lots of to gameplay. With dynamic and chained missions a gameplay can change drastically depending if part of the mission happens inside gas cloud or in deep space. A simple "fetch mission" can turned out to be an interesting adventure. I'm very excited about new flight model. It sounds like there will be lots of variety between ships and how to fly them.
  8. Yeah, I guess they just implement organization functionality in Spectrum to in-game. As far as I know they are using WebRTC so it could be that they will bring VoIP integration to browsers as well. You are probably right that 200 players is not realistic goal until OCS server-side is done. The universe could feel a bit lonely once Hurston and ArcCorp and their moons has been integrated. Gas cloud tech will bring nice athmospheric locations (pic1, pic2) and hopefully some interesting gameplay as well. Mining or salvaging inside a cloud could be profitable but very dangerous and risky; you are most likely not able to call outside for help, pirates, etc. Economics is very interesting. Tony Zurovec's CitizenCon presentation is worth to watch although he had no time to go in-depth. Delta patcher was certainly a huge step forward. My Internet connection is fast enough to handle daily 30G patches but it is still much nicer to be able to patch the game almost in no time. Today is Q&A episode about flight model in RtV. It is one of the most heated topics in game. JP did great ground work and I like how Colson is continuing from there.
  9. I don't have much details what in-game organization system will include. Do you know any details about it? I'm most likely going to star playing as solo but still I really like how CIG is pushing features forward which makes communication and emergent gameplay between players possible. FoIP+VoIP were great additions. I would like to see organization features included soon too. If I remember right they are aiming to have about 200 players/server end of this year. That's not much considering how big the playable universe should be at that point but a step forward nevertheless. I guess server meshing is last of their big required techs and definitely will take some time to get it included. There are already some smaller features in Alpha 3.4 which I really look forward; a new flight model, FPS ping & scanning, gas cloud tech and projectile manager. Of course all AI improvements are very welcomed. My biggest interest for next year are probably background simulation (economics) and salvaging. More mission tech; dynamic and chained missions would give current missions much more variety and depth so no new missions or types would be even needed yet. So far I have had lots of fun during testing alpha versions.
  10. OCS has definitely improved FPS significantly and made testing / playing easier. The current 3.3.0u has been pretty stable so far with only one CTD (Crash to Desktop) so far. I wouldn't be hugely surprised if they will decide to push 3.3.0 to Live soon. Alpha 3.3.5 will be a nice addition and will increase the size of playable universe a lot. There were few interesting presentations in CitCon about Hurston and Lorville. It is good to see how much effort they put procedural generation + handcrafting + writing. What is the tech (cloud tech, full persistence, server meshing, etc.) you are looking forward most? How about gameplay (salvaging, bounty hunting, farming, etc.)? Yeah, I definitely wouldn't hold hope too high for Squadron 42 release anytime soon. I don't personally mind when Squadron 42 will be released so in my point of view CIG can use all the time they need. I assume there are still lots of cleaning up and balancing to do. Thinking that Alpha 3.4 (and SQ42) will have a new flight model should make quite big difference in space combat and therefore affect to mission balance, etc. NPC AI, flight AI, etc. seems to still get improvement at least what comes to PU roadmap.
  11. It is not only IGN but I'm pretty tired to game media / journalism in general. The sites seems to be more or less all the same and there's no many sites I have found interesting. I guess it is just that majority of sites are not targetted my kind of gamers. As a PC gamer the choices are pretty bad. It is a bit funny how some games gets tons of visibility just visiting once in E3 stage. No Man's Sky is one such an example. PC Gamer made ridiculous amount of articles about it before the release while for example X4: Foundations has got one so far. Egosoft has made live streams, videos, interviews, etc. about X4 and media keeps total silence. PC Gamer has been advertising RDR2 quite heavily and it has not even announced for PC ... Well, anyway. I truly hope RDR2 will be amazing game. I don't care about reviews but need to give it a try myself. The theme is intereting and if it doesn't feel like a typcical "open world game" I'm very much interested.
  12. I find it hard to even have GOTY game since games are so different and it is all about my mood which I find "best" at the moment. I do buy AAA games when something interesting comes up and it is true I'm a 100% PC gamer at the moment. I guess RDR2 will be released on PC at some point later so I should have lots of time to take a deep-depth look at it before release. I'm more allergic to reviews these days. Some games are so much hyped in game media that it really feels if they get even a fair review or automatic high score. Of course can't say if RDR2 would be one of those games. I personally feel Skyrim, GTA V, etc. are overly hyped games and I did a mistake by buying them before giving them a try. That's why I'll be much more careful with RDR2.
  13. Sounds like a good plan . I'm not sure what to expect from SQ42 yet but I guess it will be a cheesy (in a good way) Hollywood space action adventure. Trailer looks beautiful and I'm looking forward their new cloud tech in Alpha 3.4 already (nebulas, etc.). Alpha 3.3 (PTU) is surprisingly fun already and getting better patch by patch. Many interesting changes has scheduled for Alpha 3.4, like a new flight model.
  14. Sorry for being negative, butI have burned my hands with so many "10/10 games" (GTA V, Skyrim, etc.) that I'm definitely not going to buy this until I'm able to give it a good try beforehand. So far I'm not convinced but of course since I have not played it yet I'm staying hopeful that the game is actually very good. Let's give it a fair try and and see after that ...
  15. The interview would have been much better without unnecessary agressiveness, would have let Brian and Tony talk and if AJ would have done a bit background work beforehand. If you can look beyond those problems the interview is not bad. AJSA forum is silent but I'm pretty sure here are many players who are looking forward to play Squadron 42 and/or Star Citizen PU. Are you looking forward to play either of those? Which one are you waiting for more?